Are patient weight and size among the patient-specific factors that affect orthopedic outcomes in regards to implant surgery? Intuitively, operating on a patient with a high body-mass index (BMI) presents additional challenges to a surgical team. Does BMI also affect functional outcomes? To inquire about this relationship, CODE Technology ran an analysis using patient-reported outcome (PRO) results from the CODE Orthopedic Registry. We did this for total knee replacements (TKA) and total hip replacements (THA).

THA Results

For THA, our analysis set was 386 patients. For these patients, we obtained pre-op, 3-month and 1-year post-op HOOS scores and BMI data. Interestingly, we found that BMI is negatively correlated with orthopedic outcomes at the pre-op timeframe. But, there was no significant correlation between BMI and the 3-month and 1-year post-op HOOS scores (overall and sub-scores). Results varied a bit by age and gender, but a significant relationship was not present in this data.  

TKA Results

With TKA data there were 622 patient outcomes analyzed. This includes BMI data, and pre- and post-op KOOS scores. As we saw with the THA results, there were no significant correlations between BMI scores and post-op KOOS scores. These results echo those from a 2012 published study* that deployed the Oxford Knee Score as a measure of post-op functional outcome.

Speaking with other surgeons, we encountered a guideline that limits or declines surgery on patients with a BMI of 40 or greater. To consider the efficacy of this approach relative to functional outcomes, we segmented both data sets at this level and compared average overall HOOS and KOOS scores, post-op to see if this rule mattered.

Interestingly, there was no significant difference in average HOOS or KOOS scores (Overall and Junior) between the set of patients with BMI scores of 39 or less and those with BMI scores of 40 or more.

Where do we go from here?

As the intuition that a higher BMI would lead to lower functional outcomes is so appealing, other factors should also be considered. Additional analysis with BMI in concert with other patient-specific patient data is warranted. However, these results indicate that patients with higher BMI scores are achieving comparable functional outcome scores to those with lower indexes.

Benchmarking in Orthopedics Guide CTAAbout CODE

CODE Technology is a PRO vendor singularly focused on collecting, reporting, and benchmarking PRO data as a service. Our real life humans – not robots, not an app – will administer surveys and handle all data collection, 100% outside of the office, you won’t even know we’re there. Better yet, with CODE as your outcomes vendor, additional employees to help with all the data won’t be necessary. Just ask our client, Joe Holmbo, Clinical Director for ORA Orthopedics. “For us to be able to collect PROs without adding any additional staff, it’s well worth the investment that we’ve made with CODE.”

Got #FOMO yet? Jump on the PRO wagon with CODE Technology. Click here to see how our platform works, or contact a PRO expert with CODE to get started.

*The Association Between Body Mass Index and the Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty.”
Paul Baker et al, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2012;94:1501-8.

About the Author

CODE Technology

CODE Technology

CODE believes patient-reported outcome data benefits everyone. When the provider and payer win, so does the patient.

marketing@codetechnology.com